SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9634

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
JIJINKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
MR. RAGHUL K R – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 14156 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SHYAM KUMAR M.P
For the Respondents: SRI.K.A. NOUSHAD

The court emphasized the requirement to approach the Sessions Court for pre-arrest bail before seeking intervention from a higher court.

Headnote:This judgment concerns a bail application under BAIL APPL. NO. 14156 OF 2025, where the court dismissed the request for pre-arrest bail citing the lack of prior application to the Sessions Court. The primary legality addressed was the procedural adherence required before seeking bail in higher courts. The applicant, Jijinkumar, has the liberty to approach the Sessions Court for his bail request.

ORDER

The applicant has directly approached this Court seeking pre-arrest bail without approaching the Sessions Court concerned.

Hence, this application for pre-arrest bail is dismissed with liberty to the applicant to approach the Sessions Court concerned.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top