SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9639

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
VASUDEVAN – Appellant
Versus
HISJA VASUDEVAN – Respondent
OP(CRL.) NO. 625 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.KRISHNAKUMAR
For the Respondents: SHRI. SAYED MANSOOR BAFAKHY THANGAL

A petition can be dismissed if the petitioner chooses not to pursue it.

Headnote:The case involved the dismissal of an Original Petition due to the petitioner's submission not to press it. The court found no merit in proceeding further. The decision highlighted the court's authority to dismiss petitions based on the petitioner's own request. The final ruling was to dismiss the Original Petition as not pressed.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not pressing the Original Petition.

Recording the above submission, the Original Petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE

Jms

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top