SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9642

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
E. K. AMBAREESH – Appellant
Versus
M/S. KERALA GRAMIN BANK – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2964 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.DEVADAS H. MALLAN
For the Respondents: SRI. JAWAHAR JOSE, SC

The Court granted permission for a loan defaulter to remove movables from secured property, facilitating compliance with recovery laws.

Headnote:The judgment discusses the provisions of the SARFAESI Act pertaining to secured assets. The petitioner, a loan defaulter, sought to retrieve movables from the secured property after financial distress due to COVID-19. The Court allowed the removal in the presence of the bank's representatives, ensuring an inventory is signed. The case illustrates the balance of interests under recovery laws.

Table of Content
1. property details, loan default due to pandemic. (Para 1)
2. counsel discusses removal of movables. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. court permits removal of movables. (Para 5)

BASANT BALAJI J ======================

W.P. (C) No. 2964 of 2026 ========================

Dated 11th day of February 2026 JUDGMENT The petitioner is the owner in possession of 1.66 Ares of property comprised in Re-Sy. No. 516/5-3-2. For the purpose of constructing a residential house, the petitioner availed three loan facilities from the respondent Bank. The petitioner was initially regular in remitting the loan instalments. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic and the consequent lockdown, the petitioner suffered severe business setbacks. Though the petitioner continued to remit the instalments to the extent possible, persistent financial difficulties ultimately compelled the petitioner to wind up the business. Despite earnest efforts to mobilise funds, the petitioner was unable to clear the outstanding liability and consequently defaulted in repayment. On account of such default, the respondent Bank initiated proceedings under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act and filed M.C. No.736 of 2025 before the jurisdictional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court seeking assistance for taking possession of the secured asset. Pursuant thereto, an Advocate Commissioner was appointed to take physical possession of the secured asset.Aggrieved by the said proceedings, the present writ petition has been filed.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent bank.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the movables lying in the secured asset, of which physical possession has been taken by the respondent Bank, may be permitted to be removed by the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner is ready to be present at the secured asset at 02.00 p.m. on 16.02.2026 for the said purpose.

4. The learned counsel for the respondent Bank submitted that the respondent Bank has no objection in permitting the petitioner to remove the movables from the secured property.

5. In the above circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to remove the movables from the property on 16.02.2026 between 02.00 p.m. and 05.00 p.m. The representatives of the respondent Bank shall also be present at the property at 02.00 p.m. on the said date. At the time of removal of the movables, an inventory shall be prepared and the same shall be signed by both parties.

With the above observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top