Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
E. VIJAYARAGHAVAN @ VIJAYAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 9803 OF 2015
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims long-standing practice in homeopathy. (Para 1) |
| 2. court references a past ruling pertinent to the petitioner's appeal. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioner claims to have been practicing Homeopathic System of Medicine since 1978. He claims to have an unblemished practice all along. He is aggrieved by Ext.P17 refusing to consider his representation dated 22.01.2025.
2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as respondents, it is noticed that by the decision in Central Council of Indian Medicine and others v. State of Kerala and others [2020 KHC Online 759], the reliefs claimed by the petitioner cannot be granted.
In the said decision, this Court has already declared that the first proviso to Section 38 of the Travancore-Cochin Medical Practitioners Act , 1953, is unconstitutional. Therefore, the writ petition has to be dismissed.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
