Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9648

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
K. MOHANAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
THE TAHSILDAR, CHERTHALA TALUK OFFICE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 25275 OF 2018

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR, SRI.ARJUN RAGHAVAN, SRI.ADITHYA RAJEEV
For the Respondents: ADV. RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE

A writ petition abates upon the death of the petitioner, nullifying further proceedings.

Headnote:The petitioner submitted that they have expired, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition as abated. This raises issues concerning the continuation of legal proceedings and the standing of parties in light of the petitioner's demise. The court concluded that due to the petitioner's death, the writ could not proceed further.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has expired.

In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as abated.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9648

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JK. MOHANAN NAIR – AppellantVersusTHE TAHSILDAR, CHERTHALA TALUK OFFICE – RespondentWP(C) NO. 25275 OF 2018

A writ petition abates upon the death of the petitioner, nullifying further proceedings.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
K. MOHANAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
THE TAHSILDAR, CHERTHALA TALUK OFFICE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 25275 OF 2018