SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9649

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
BIJIN RAY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 26527 OF 2015



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN
For the Respondents:SRI.K.A.JALEEL, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL, SRI.R.SREEHARI

The court determines that the petitioners' claims became infructuous, leading to the dismissal of the Writ Petition.

Headnote:The judgment assessed the statutory basis for the petitioners' claims, primarily referencing the TC Medical Practitioners Act and highlighted they became infructuous due to the counsel's submission. The central issue framed was whether the petition was viable. The court concluded by dismissing the Writ Petition as infructuous, in line with its findings.

JUDGMENT

The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has become infructuous.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top