Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
SHREEJEE MATHEWS – Appellant
Versus
THE TRAVANCORE COCHIN MEDICAL COUNCIL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges registration denial due to lack of recognized qualifications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments highlight previous judgments on practitioner registration. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court observes existing laws restrict registration for unqualified practitioners. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court confirms the challenges against registration decisions must fail. (Para 7) |
| 5. potential future rights depend on unpassed statutes. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioner challenges Exhibit-P1 to Exhibit-P14 and also seeks for a declaration that he is competent to be granted ‘A’ class registration for practicing Naturopathy and Yoga treatment. A further direction is sought for, to direct the first respondent to grant ‘A’ class provisional registration to the petitioner till the constitution of a separate Council for Naturopathy and Yoga and also to take steps to include Naturopathy and Yoga treatment as Indian System of Medicine under the Travancore Cochin Medical Practitioners Act, 1953 .
2. Petitioner claimed to have completed his SSLC in the year
2001 and joined for Diploma in Naturopathy and Yogic Science at Akhil Bharathiya Prakritik Chikitsa Parishad and completed the said course in the ye
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
