O R D E R

(Dated this the 11th day of February, 2026)

When the matter came up for arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner is absent and there is no representation.

2. The de facto complainant in Crime No.311 of 2022 of Kunnamangalam Police Station, filed this Crl.M.C under Section 439 (2) of Cr.PC praying for cancelling the bail granted by the Sessions Judge, Kozhikode, to the accused/respondent Nos.1 and 2. The learned Sessions Judge granted bail to the respondents 1 and 2 as early as on 18.07.2022.

3. Now the learned counsel for the respondents as well as the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that, in this case, the police had already completed the investigation and filed final report and the case is now pending before the Sessions Court for trial.

In the above circumstance, there is no scope for cancelling the bail granted to the respondents 1 and 2, at this belated stage, and accordingly, this Crl.M.C is dismissed.

Sd/-