Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9653

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
MANOJ @ OMANAKUTTAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 1661 OF 2022

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.MOHAMED SABAH, SMT.SAIPOOJA, SRI.SADIK ISMAYIL
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

A petition may be dismissed if the petitioner does not press the case.

Headnote:The petitioner, in Crl.M.C No. 1661 of 2022, requested an admission regarding dismissal as not pressed. The court noted the counsel's submission and accordingly decided the matter. The core issue was whether the application could be dismissed based on the petitioner's request. The court determined that the motion should be dismissed as not pressed.

Result: The application is dismissed as not pressed.

ORDER

Dated this the 11^th day of February, 2026 The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Crl.M.C is not pressed and hence it can be dismissed as not pressed.

In the light of the above submission, this Crl.M.C is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9653

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC.PRATHEEP KUMAR, JMANOJ @ OMANAKUTTAN – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 1661 OF 2022

A petition may be dismissed if the petitioner does not press the case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
MANOJ @ OMANAKUTTAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 1661 OF 2022