SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9656

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
MIDHUNLAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.RAMESH .P, SMT.FATHIMA NARGIS K.A.
For the Respondents: SMT. C.SEENA

ORDER

Dated this the 11th day of February, 2026 The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in this case, the petitioner was already acquitted by the trial court and as such Sd/-

C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, JUDGE Pvv APPENDIX OF CRL.MC NO. 339 2 OF 202 2 PETITIONER ANNEXURES ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL.M.P.NO.116/2022 IN S.C.NO.454/2021 DATED 05.04.2022 OF HON'BLE SPECIAL COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top