SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9656

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
MIDHUNLAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 3392 OF 2022 | CRIME NO.2164/2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.RAMESH .P, SMT.FATHIMA NARGIS K.A.
For the Respondents: SMT. C.SEENA

The court affirmed the acquittal of the petitioner due to insufficient grounds for conviction.

Headnote:This judgment examines the acquittal of the petitioner in criminal proceedings under the applicable rules. The trial court previously acquitted the petitioner, asserting that there were no sufficient grounds for conviction. The primary issue addressed was the legitimacy of this acquittal in the face of prosecutorial challenges. Ultimately, the court upheld the trial court's decision of acquittal without further proceedings.

ORDER

Dated this the 11th day of February, 2026 The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in this case, the petitioner was already acquitted by the trial court and as such Sd/-

C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, JUDGE Pvv APPENDIX OF CRL.MC NO. 339 2 OF 202 2 PETITIONER ANNEXURES ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL.M.P.NO.116/2022 IN S.C.NO.454/2021 DATED 05.04.2022 OF HON'BLE SPECIAL COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top