SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9657

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
SADIQ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 3718 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.L.RAJESH NARAYAN
For the Respondents: SRI.V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)

A petition that becomes infructuous must be dismissed as per procedural laws.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: Under the prevailing criminal procedure, the petitioner moved for dismissal of the Crl.M.C. claiming it to be infructuous. Facts of the Case: The petitioner sought to withdraw the proceedings citing various annexures including FIR and final report pertaining to crime number.

Findings of Court:
The court acknowledged the petitioner's claims and concurred with the suggested dismissal.

Issues: The court primarily considered whether the Crl.M.C. should be deemed infructuous.

Ratio Decidendi: The court articulated that if a petition becomes infructuous, it must necessarily be dismissed.

Result: In the result, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed as infructuous.

ORDER

Dated this the 11th day of February, 2026 The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Crl.M.C. became infructuous and accordingly it could be dismissed. In the result, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top