SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9658

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
BEHANNAN VARGHESE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.P.PRASANTH, SHRI.JOBIN ABRAHAM, SMT.T.S.KRISHNENDU, SMT.ARCHANA SURESH, SRI.SURYA RAJ N.S.
For the Respondents: SR.PP. SRI. BREEZ.M.S

SR.PP. SRI. BREEZ.M.S THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.02.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Dated this the 11th day of February, 2026 Petitioner absent without any representation. The accused no.22 in Crime No.637/2019 of Mala police station, filed this Crl.M.C.

under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for quashing the FIR against him.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor upon instructions submitted that in this case, the police already completed the investigation and filed final report. In the above circumstances, this Crl.M.C. became infructuous and accordingly it is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top