SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9661

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
BINU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.NEBIL NIZAR, SHRI.AKHIL J CHANDRAN
For the Respondents: ADV SHRI.AJAY JAYACHANDRAN

ORDER

Dated this the 11th day of February, 2026 The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petitioner died on 08.07.2024. So far no application has been preferred by the legal representatives of the revision petitioner for impleading them in the party array.

2. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the legal representatives of the revision petitioner have no idea to proceed with this matter. In the above circumstances, this Criminal Revision Petition is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top