Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
MIDHUN K. RAJAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused petitioned for quashing based on settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsels confirmed amicable settlement; no objection to quashing. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court applied established legal principles to justify quashing. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER
The petitioner is the 1st accused in Crime No.1608/2025 registered by the Museum Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 316 (2) and 318(4) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the filing of the complaint has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent, who has executed Annexure A2 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 2nd respondent.
4. The learned counsel on either side submit that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the parties have resolved their
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
