Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
N.K.ABDUL RAHMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case arose from an amicable settlement between parties. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties and prosecutor agree on quashing based on settlement. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's inherent powers allow quashing non-grave cases. (Para 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
Dated this the 11th day of February, 2026 The petitioners are the accused 1 to 4 in C.C.No.773/2021 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Hosdurg, which has arisen from Crime No.1330/2020 registered by the Hosdurg Police Station, Kasaragod, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Section 34 1 , 323, 324 and 506(i) read with of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the respondents 2 and 3, who have executed Annexures AIII and AIV affidavits, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel f
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
