SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9674

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
ASWIN T.M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.MANOJKUMAR
For the Respondents: SMT.FATHIMA SALIM, SMT.SEETHA S

O R D E R

Dated this the 11th day of February, 2026 The petitioners are the accused in Crime No.13/2026 registered by the Mararikulam Police Station, Alappuzha, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 189 (2), 191(2), 329(3) and 324(4) read with Section 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.

2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the 2nd respondent, who has executed Annexure-A2 affidavit, affirming the settlement.

3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 2nd respondent.

4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the parties have resolved their disputes amicably. The 2nd respondent has no subsisting grievance and does not wish to pursue the prosecution, and has no objection to the proceedings being quashed.

5. The learned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top