SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9683

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SHIJU MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.S.DHANESH KUMAR
For the Respondents: SRI.M.P.PRASANATH, PP

O R D E R

The Criminal Miscellaneous Case is filed to quash Annexure-1 FIR, Annexure-2 final report and all further proceedings in C.C.No.64 of 2017 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Thrippunithura ('Trial Court', in short), which has originated from Crime No.1057 of 2015 registered by the Hill Palace Police Station, Ernakulam.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. On a perusal of the materials on record, it is seen that the petitioner had filed an application for discharge before the Trial Court, which was dismissed by Annexure-3 order. Subsequently, he filed Crl.M.C.No1279 of 2018 to quash the proceedings. However, by Annexure-4 order dated 12.04.2018, this Court dismissed the Crl.M.C., but by reserving the right of the petitioner to challenge Annexure- 3 order, dismissing his application for discharge.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in compliance with Annexure-4 order, the petitioner filed Crl.R.P.No.98 of 2018 before the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Ernakulam ('Revisional Court', in short). Nevertheless, by Annexure-5 order, the said revision petition wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top