IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SHIJU MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
O R D E R
The Criminal Miscellaneous Case is filed to quash Annexure-1 FIR, Annexure-2 final report and all further proceedings in C.C.No.64 of 2017 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Thrippunithura ('Trial Court', in short), which has originated from Crime No.1057 of 2015 registered by the Hill Palace Police Station, Ernakulam.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
3. On a perusal of the materials on record, it is seen that the petitioner had filed an application for discharge before the Trial Court, which was dismissed by Annexure-3 order. Subsequently, he filed Crl.M.C.No1279 of 2018 to quash the proceedings. However, by Annexure-4 order dated 12.04.2018, this Court dismissed the Crl.M.C., but by reserving the right of the petitioner to challenge Annexure- 3 order, dismissing his application for discharge.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in compliance with Annexure-4 order, the petitioner filed Crl.R.P.No.98 of 2018 before the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Ernakulam ('Revisional Court', in short). Nevertheless, by Annexure-5 order, the said revision petition wa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.