Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A.MUHAMMED HASHIM, N.P.PRAJEESH
For the Respondents: SRI RENJIT GEORGE, SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The court upholds the right to withdraw a petition, affirming judicial discretion in allowing such withdrawals.

Headnote:The petitioner's counsel requested to withdraw the Crl.M.C. which was granted, leading to the closure of the case without adverse order. The court held that permission to withdraw could be allowed in accordance with procedural norms, affirming the discretionary power of the bench in matters of withdrawal.

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the Crl.M.C. Permission is granted.

The Crl.M.C. is closed as withdrawn.

(Sd/-)

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :