SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9698

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
PARANCHERY AHAMED KABEER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JOSEPH KURIAN VALLAMATTAM, SHRI.LAL K.JOSEPH, SHRI.P.MURALEEDHARAN, SRI.V.S.SHIRAZ BAVA
For the Respondents: SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON, SMT.KAVERY S THAMPI

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petitioner is no more, and that so far no persons have approached for getting impleaded as the legal representatives of the deceased revision petitioner.

In the light of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this revision petition is closed as abated by the death of the revision petitioner.

sd/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top