Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
SHAFI K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eligibility for regularization is based on qualifications and prior service. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the court acknowledges submissions and indicates the way forward. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directs actions based on the regulations and prior case law. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, who is working as a temporary employee under the 2nd respondent, Kerala State Waqf Board, states that with reference to the provisions of Clause 5.2(2) of Ext.P7 Regulations of the year 2016, since he was appointed with the requisite qualifications as per the Regulations in force at the time when he was appointed, the petitioner could be regularized in view of the 7 years’ service already put in.
2. Sri. C.S.Ajith Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner, points out that the 2nd respondent Board has also recommended the regularization as above pursuant to the proceedings of Ext.P8, and that an application at Ext.P10 has been filed before the 1st respondent herein.
3. I have also heard Sri. Jamsheed Hafiz, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 2 and 3, as well as Sri. N.B Sunil Nath, learned Government Pleader.
4. In view of the contentions raised in this writ petition as well as the submissions m
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
