Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9708

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
SUBRAMANIAN A.T. – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 30788 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.S.SAJEEV KUMAR, SMT.LAKSHMI S KUMAR, SMT.A.N.JYOTHILEKSHMI
For the Respondents: SRI.C.A.CHACKO, SMT.SYLAJA S.L., GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Cases declared infructuous due to the petitioners' submission do not warrant further judicial review.

Headnote:The court evaluated the petitions submitted concerning the cooperative society's actions, concluding the matter to be infructuous due to the petitioners' own assertion. As a result, the court dismissed the writ petition effectively on the grounds that no further action was warranted based on presented facts. The court thus ruled the case unviable for consideration leading to the dismissal, stating, 'This writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.'

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the petitioners points out that the matter has become infructuous.

In the light of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9708

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMHARISANKAR V. MENON, JSUBRAMANIAN A.T. – AppellantVersusTHE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) – RespondentWP(C) NO. 30788 OF 2023

Cases declared infructuous due to the petitioners' submission do not warrant further judicial review.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
SUBRAMANIAN A.T. – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 30788 OF 2023