Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9713

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
SEBASTIAN KURIAKOSE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 39440 OF 2016

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.PAUL K.VARGHESE
For the Respondents: SRI.P.FAZIL, SMT.JAYASREE MANOJ, SMT.PARVATHI VENUGOPAL, SRI.SAJU THALIATH, SRI.V.S.SREEJITH, SRI.E C BINEESH, PP

A petitioner may withdraw from proceedings, leading to dismissal of a case for non-prosecution.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a Writ Petition challenging an order; however, the counsel for the petitioner stated that the petitioner is not pressing the petition. The court acknowledges this and dismisses the Writ Petition as not pressed. The matter is concluded with this dismissal on 11th February 2026.

K.BABU, J.

--------------------------------------

W.P (C) No.39440 of 2016 ---------------------------------------

Dated this the 11^th day of February, 2026 JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not pressing the Writ Petition.

Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9713

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMK. BABU, JSEBASTIAN KURIAKOSE – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 39440 OF 2016

A petitioner may withdraw from proceedings, leading to dismissal of a case for non-prosecution.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
SEBASTIAN KURIAKOSE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 39440 OF 2016