SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9714

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. NATARAJAN, JOHNSON JOHN, JJ
SAPPER SANTHOSH KUMAR S – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH KUMAR SINGH IAS – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 3121 OF 2025|WP(C) NO.15269 OF 2024|REVIEW PETITION NO.752/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.RATHEESH B.
For the Respondents: SHRI.S.BIJU

Non-compliance with court orders can lead to contempt proceedings; compliance may negate need for further actions.

Headnote:This Contempt Case concerns willful disobedience of a previous order from W.P.

(C) No.15269/2024. The court reviewed the compliance status through submissions from respondents. The learned counsel indicated the issuance of PPO, leading to the conclusion that no further action is required, granting liberty to the petitioner should compliance not be fully met.

Table of Content
1. compliance with court orders is essential. (Para 1 , 2)
2. review of compliance indicates full execution of orders. (Para 3 , 4)

K. NATARAJAN, J.

This Contempt Case is filed by the petitioner for willful disobedience of the order of this Court passed in W.P.(C) No.15269/2024 and order of the Review Petition No.752/2025.

2. The learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the respondents filed an affidavit along with PPO before this Court on the last date of hearing. Thereafter, the case was adjourned for getting instructions by the petitioner.

3. We have perused the PPO issued by the respondents in compliance to the order of this Court in both Writ Petition and Review Petition.

4. The learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the PPO has been issued on 06.02.2026 and the preparation of bill for crediting the amount will take another one or two weeks. The submission of the learned Senior Panel counsel is placed on record. 5. In view of the compliance of the order of this Court by the respondents, there is no need to take any further action in this matter.

Accordingly, the Contempt Case is presently closed.

However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the Court, if the order is not fully complied by the respondents.

Pending IAs' if any, do not survive for any consideration. Hence, the IAs' are disposed of.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top