SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9715

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. NATARAJAN, JOHNSON JOHN, JJ
GP CAPT R VISWANATHAN(RETD) – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 41001 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.V.K.SATHYANATHAN, SHRI.VINOD K.C., SMT.RATI VARMA, SMT.K.R.RENJU
For the Respondents: SHRI.VISHNU J.

Withdrawal of a writ petition allows petitioners to seek alternative remedies in appropriate tribunals.

Headnote:The judgment addresses the withdrawal of a writ petition by the petitioner seeking liberty to approach the Armed Forces Tribunal for review. The petitioner's request was recorded with the provision for further legal recourse in a pertinent tribunal. The Court granted the sought liberty and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner to pursue other available avenues for remedy.

K. NATARAJAN, J.

After arguing sometime, the learned counsel for the petitioner is seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to approach the Armed Forces Tribunal for filing review.

The said submission is placed on record.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn and liberty granted as prayed for.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top