Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9722

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.M.MANOJ, J
K.R.PRADEEP KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR(PERSONNEL) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2505 OF 2018

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: U.BALAGANGADHARAN
For the Respondents: HARISH GOPINATH

The Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous based on the petitioner's submission.

Headnote:This judgment concerns WP

(C) No. 2505 of 2018, where the petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. The Court recorded this submission and ultimately dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. The dismissal is based on the petitioner’s statement about the status of the case.

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 11^th day of February, 2026 When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous.

The said submission is recorded. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9722

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP.M.MANOJ, JK.R.PRADEEP KUMAR – AppellantVersusTHE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR(PERSONNEL) – RespondentWP(C) NO. 2505 OF 2018

The Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous based on the petitioner's submission.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.M.MANOJ, J
K.R.PRADEEP KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR(PERSONNEL) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2505 OF 2018