SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9727

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.M.MANOJ, J
AJAYAKUMAR E.V. – Appellant
Versus
THALAYAZHAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.I.ABDUL RASHEED, SMT.P.K.MINIMOLE
For the Respondents: SMT.KAVERY S.THAMPI, SHRI.P.SATHISAN, SMT.R.ANJALI, SRI.ADITYA THEJUS KRISHNAN, SRI.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, SRI.S.RAJMOHAN

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 11th day of February, 2026 The writ petition is filed challenging Ext.P7 order of the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions and Ext.P6 Government Order, whereby it is stated that no prior clearance from the District Telecom Committee (DTC) is required for issuance of a permit by the concerned Local Self Government Institution for installation of a mobile tower.

2. When the matter was taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel appearing for the 6th respondent submitted that no mobile tower has been installed, as alleged by the petitioners. In view of the said submission, no further orders are required in the matter.

Accordingly, the writ petition is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top