Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9729

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
CHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
BIJU – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 168 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.11698 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.FARHANA K.H., SHRI.MUHASIN K.M.
For the Respondents: SMT DEEPA V

The court confirmed compliance with prior directions, leading to closure of the contempt proceedings.

Headnote:This judgment concerns contempt proceedings in CON.CASE

(C) No. 168 of 2026 against a decision from WP

(C) No. 11698 of 2025. The court considered compliance with its previous directions as elaborated in the said judgment. The issue framed revolves around ensuring compliance with court orders. The court found that the directions were indeed complied with. As a result, the contempt case was subsequently closed.

JUDGMENT

When this contempt case came up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader submitted that the directions in the judgment dated 27.03.2025 is complied with.

If that is the case no further direction is necessary.

Therefore, this contempt case is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9729

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JCHANDRAN – AppellantVersusBIJU – RespondentCON.CASE(C) NO. 168 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.11698 OF 2025

The court confirmed compliance with prior directions, leading to closure of the contempt proceedings.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
CHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
BIJU – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 168 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.11698 OF 2025