Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9734

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ISMAYIL RAFEEQ – Appellant
Versus
GHOLY V T – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 180 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.11462 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.ABOOBACKER SIDHEEQUE
For the Respondents: Government Pleader

The court determined that compliance with prior judgment obviated further proceedings in contempt.

Headnote:In assessing compliance with the judgment dated 21.03.2025, the court noted the Government Pleader's submission on adherence to court directions. Given the compliance, no further direction was deemed necessary, leading to the conclusion of the contempt proceedings.

JUDGMENT

When this contempt case came up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader submitted that the directions in the judgment dated 21.03.2025 is complied with.

If that is the case no further direction is necessary.

Therefore, this contempt case is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9734

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JISMAYIL RAFEEQ – AppellantVersusGHOLY V T – RespondentCON.CASE(C) NO. 180 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.11462 OF 2025

The court determined that compliance with prior judgment obviated further proceedings in contempt.

Headnote:In assessing compliance with the judgment dated 21.03.2025, the court noted the Government Pleader's submission on adherence to court directions. Given the compliance, no further direction was deemed necessary, leading to the conclusion of the contempt proceedings.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ISMAYIL RAFEEQ – Appellant
Versus
GHOLY V T – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 180 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.11462 OF 2025