SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9755

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
TIMOTHY THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
THE CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 46520 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SUSANTH SHAJI, SHRI.SIDHARTH O., SHRI.ALBIN A. JOSEPH, SMT.NEKHA VARGHESE, SRI.V.V.SHAJI
For the Respondents: SHRI.NIRMAL.S

The court emphasized adherence to statutory procedures regarding name corrections in school records, as mandated by relevant educational regulations.

Headnote:In the judgment, the petitioner sought a direction to correct the school records based on an examination of the Secondary School Examination certificate which revealed a name mistake. The court identified necessary procedures for name corrections under the Board's byelaws and noted the absence of any request from the school for corrections. It allowed for future requests through the Harkara portal. The court also addressed a subsequent submission of an application by the school to the CBSE, indicating that appropriate actions should follow. Consequently, the court directed the regional officer to evaluate the submission and act within four weeks. The primary questions revolved around adherence to procedures for correcting records under relevant statutes and the board's rules. The court reasoned that until proper requests are made via the prescribed method, no direction can be issued to the CBSE. In light of the new situation with the application submitted by the school, it found merit in allowing the petitioner's request. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with directions for prompt action on the application made by the school.

Table of Content
1. procedures for name correction in school records (Para 2 , 3)
2. requirement for applications through harkara portal (Para 4 , 5)
3. allowance for future application requests (Para 6)
4. court's directive for speedy processing of submitted application (Para 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT

Petitioner seeks for a direction to correct the school records in relation to the name of the petitioner and that of his father as entered in Ext.P1

2. Petitioner is an Indian Citizen. He has been studying in the 4th respondent school, where he appeared for the Secondary School Examination [for brevity, SSE] in the year 2023. However, when the certificate for the SSE was examined, it was found that there was a mistake in his name, and hence, he has approached this Court seeking a direction to correct the mistake in Ext.P1 Certificate.

3. A statement has been filed by the first respondent wherein it is mentioned in paragraph No.4, as follows:-

“4.It is humbly submitted that for any kind of Correction or Name Change request candidate has to apply on Board's Harkara Portal through the concerned school. This Respondent had through a notification dated 25.06.2015 made amendment to the byelaws and made certain changes in Rules 69.1 and 69.2 (iv) of the bye laws relating to correction & change in name and period of correction in date of birth. However in this case, the Board's concerned Regional Office, Delhi (East) has not received any such kind of request through the above said school on the Harkara Portal from the petitioner.”

4. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing counsel for the CBSE.

5. It is evident from the statement of the first respondent that for carrying out correction of name, a request has to be forwarded through the Harkara portal, by the school concerned. Till date, no request has been received from the School. Since the school has not forwarded any request to correct the name of the petitioner, a direction cannot be issued to the first respondent at this juncture, to carry out such corrections as requested by the petitioner.

6. It is however open for the petitioner to request the school to submit an application to the first respondent through the Harkara portal for carrying out necessary correction. Ext.P18 is said to have been submitted by the petitioner to the school for making such a request. Obviously, if such a request has been received by the 4th respondent, there is no reason to assume that appropriate action as required by CBSE, shall not be initiated.

7. After the above paragraphs were dictated on 06.02.2026 and the writ petition was closed without any specific direction, this Court posted the writ petition as ‘to be spoken to’, today (i.e.,10.02.2026). The learned counsel for the petitioner today submitted that after the last hearing of the case, the 4th respondent school had informed that they have already submitted an application as required by the CBSE, through the Harkara Portal, with ID No.HD2690125001.

8. Though the learned Standing Counsel for the CBSE is unaware about such an application having been received; I am of the view that in the light of the changed situation, this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction.

Accordingly, if the 4th respondent has already submitted an application through the Harkara Portal for carrying out the corrections as requested by the petitioner, necessarily the third respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of.

sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top