IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MADHAVAN PILLAI.G. LALU – Appellant
Versus
SECRETARY, KOCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“a) To issue a Writ of Mandamus or other appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing to 1st respondent to take an appropriate steps or order for removing unauthorized construction of the respondent No: 3 and 4.
b) To issue such other appropriate writ or order of direction as this Honorable court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” (SIC)
2. The main prayer in this writ petition is to issue appropriate direction to the 1st respondent to take appropriate steps or order for removing the unauthorised construction made by respondent Nos.3 and 4.
3. Now, a statement is filed by the 1st respondent, in which an order dated 01.10.2024 is produced as Annexure-1. This Court perused the same. In Annexure-1, it is stated that there is no violation of the provisions of the Municipality Act and the same is stated in the concluding portion of Annexure-1. But the counsel for the petitioner takes me through the previous paragraph of the concluding paragraph and stated that there is some violation of the and he may be able to convince the same to the Secretary. If that be the case, the petitioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.