JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

“(i) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari calling for the records leading to Ext.P6 and quash the same as arbitrarily and illegal, in the interest of justice.

(ii) Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No. 3 to see that the 5threspondent is not running crusher unit in any unauthorized buildings and without obtaining valid Establishment permit underSection 233of theKerala Panchayathraj Act, within the 2ndrespondent Gramapanchayath, in the interest of justice.

(iii) Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No. 4 to consider Ext.P3 Complaint and pass orders after giving chance of being heard to the petitioners, within the time limit fixed by this honorable court, in the interest of justice.

(iv) Dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents.

(v) Grant such other reliefs just and proper in the nature of this case.”[SIC]

2. The grievance of the petitioners is that a crusher unit is functioning in an unauthorised building by the

5^th respondent.

3. The counsel appearing for the 5^th respondent submitted that an application for regularisation of the building is already pending before the 3