Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ABHILASH K – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenge unauthorized building operation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. pending regularization matters raised by the respondent. (Para 3) |
| 3. court urges timely resolution of regularization application. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari calling for the records leading to Ext.P6 and quash the same as arbitrarily and illegal, in the interest of justice.
(ii) Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No. 3 to see that the 5threspondent is not running crusher unit in any unauthorized buildings and without obtaining valid Establishment permit underSection 233of theKerala Panchayathraj Act, within the 2ndrespondent Gramapanchayath, in the interest of justice.
(iii) Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No. 4 to consider Ext.P3 Complaint and pass orders after giving chance of being heard to the petitioners, within the time limit fixed by this honorable court, in the interest of justice.
(iv) Dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents.
(v) Grant such other reliefs just and proper in the nature of this case.”[SIC]
2. The grievance of the petitioners is th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
