IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ISSAC JOHN – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CIVIL STATION KOTTAYAM DISTRICT – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"1. Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction, calling for the records leading to Ext.P3 and P4 and quash the same as illegal.
2. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction, directing the 2nd respondent to re- consider Exhibit P2 application in accordance with law and to pass orders within a time frame to be fixed by this court.
3. Kindly dispense with the production of translation of vernacular documents.
4. Grant Such other Relief. "
[SIC]
2. The petitioner submitted an application in Form
5, in accordance with the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, which resulted in Ext.P1, by which the Form 5 application is allowed. In Ext.P1, it is clearly stated that, if the property is deleted from the data bank it will not affect the adjacent paddy land or the natural water channels. Thereafter, the petitioner submitted a Form-7 application, as evident by Ext.P2. The same was dismissed with a single sentence, as evident by Ext.P3 order. The petitioner filed an appeal against the same, and the same is also rejected as evident by Ext.P4.
The pet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.