Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 10042
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, P. Krishna Kumar, JJ
AMMU ZACHARIAH @ ELIZABETH – Appellant
Versus
JOSEPH @ RAJU – Respondent
RFA NO. 120 OF 2025
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri. Manu Vyasan Peter, Sri. P.B. Subramanyan, Sri. Sabu George
For the Respondents: Adv. M.A Bijoy Kumar
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri. Manu Vyasan Peter, Sri. P.B. Subramanyan, Sri. Sabu George
For the Respondents: Adv. M.A Bijoy Kumar
Court fees must be paid for an appeal to be valid; failure to pay leads to rejection.
Headnote:In the context of RFA No. 120 of 2025, concerns about non-payment of court fees were raised leading to the appeal's rejection. The appellants expressed disinterest in pursuing the appeal further. Consequently, the court deemed no additional orders necessary and instructed the registry to return the appeal to the District Court, reflecting the resolution of the matter's procedural aspect.
A submission is made across the Bar by Adv.M.A Bijoy Kumar that, the appellants are not interested in paying the balance court fee and prosecuting the appeal.
In the light thereof, no further orders are necessary. Registry to send back the appeal to the District Court.
Sathish Ninan, Judge P. Krishna Kumar, Judge
