JUDGMENT

The petitioner has filed the captioned writ petition seeking to challenge Exts.P1 and P2 Assessment orders under the provisions of the Kerala Building Tax Act , 1975, contending that the petitioner, being a religious institution, is entitled for exemption from payment of tax.

2. Heard Sri Jijo Paul Kallookaran, learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as Sri. Alan Priyadershi Dev, the learned Government Pleader.

3. This Court takes note of the judgment of the Apex Court in Government of Kerala and Another v. Mother Superior Adoration Convent [2021 (5) SCC 602] , wherein the Apex Court, considering a similar claim, categorically found that when the “dominant” activity is religious, the benefit of exemption requires to be extended. Therefore, prima facie, I am of the opinion that the petitioner is justified in contending that it is entitled for exemption. However, this Court takes note of the contention raised by Sri. Alan Priyadershini Dev, with reference to the observations contained in paragraph No.7 of Ext.P12 order issued by the Government to the effect that the exemption with respect to prayer room has already been extended and it is only for the balance portion, w