Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 10118

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
G SURESH – Appellant
Versus
JEEVAN BABU – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1465 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.29038 OF 2024

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ANIL GEORGE, SRI.JOBY JACOB PULICKEKUDY, SMT.SMITHA PHILIPOSE, SHRI.ASHIK TOM, SHRI.ALEX KEVIN GEORGE, SHRI.ADARSH K., SMT.AINA SHIREEN N.I.
For the Respondents: ADV.SRI.GEORGIE JOHNY-SC

Court confirmed compliance with previous directions leading to closure of contempt proceedings.

Headnote:This Contempt of Court case arose from WP

(C) No. 29038 of 2024. The court examined the compliance with its previous directions. It was found that both parties confirmed compliance, leading to the closure of the case. The court's main finding was that the implemented directions satisfied the requirements set forth in the earlier judgment. The final verdict concluded with 'this Contempt of Court case is closed.'

JUDGMENT

Today, when the matter came up for consideration, it was submitted by both sides, that the directions are complied with.

Accordingly, this Contempt of Court case is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 10118

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., JG SURESH – AppellantVersusJEEVAN BABU – RespondentCON.CASE(C) NO. 1465 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.29038 OF 2024

Court confirmed compliance with previous directions leading to closure of contempt proceedings.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
G SURESH – Appellant
Versus
JEEVAN BABU – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1465 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.29038 OF 2024