SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 10130

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
PATTATHIL SREEJITH – Appellant
Versus
HDFC BANK – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 47779 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: KUM.GAYATHRI MURALEEDHARAN, SMT.ARCHANA B., SHRI.AJIN K. KURIAKOSE, SMT.SRUTHILAKSHMI SHAJI
For the Respondents: SMT.S.AMBILY, SMT.RUPA R. NAIR, SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI (SR.)

A borrower must comply with loan repayment terms to prevent coercive actions by the lender.

Headnote:The petitioner availed a housing loan of Rs.12,00,000 from the respondent bank in 2016, which led to proceedings under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The Court noted compliance with an interim order and that the bank proposed to regularize the loan account after overdue payments were made. The Court directed payments in installments, with provisions for default.

Result: The writ petition is disposed of in favor of the petitioner.

Table of Content
1. details of loan and proceedings initiated. (Para 1 , 2)
2. bank's position and compliance with conditions outlined. (Para 3)
3. directions issued for payment and consequences of default. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 30th day of January, 2026)

The petitioner availed a housing loan of Rs.12,00,000/-

from the respondent bank in the year 2016. Due to non- repayment of the loan amount, the respondent initiated proceedings under the SARFAESI Act , 2002, by issuing Ext.P2 notice dated 29.09.2025, followed by 13(4) notice dated 28.10.2025. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed this writ petition.

2. On 19.12.2025, this Court granted an interim order deferring the coercive steps against the petitioner, on condition that the petitioner shall remit an amount of Rs.75,000/- within one month. It is submitted that the said interim order has been complied with.

3. The learned Standing Counsel for the Bank, on instructions, submits that the overdue amount as on date is Rs.1,88,831/-. The Bank has no objection in regularizing the loan account.

4. Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, and taking note of the fact that the Bank is proposing to take physical possession of the property and since the Bank has no objection in regularizing the loan account, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with the following directions:

a) The petitioner shall remit the overdue amount of Rs.1,88,831/- (Rupees one lakh eighty eight thousand eight hundred and thirty one only) together with any accrued interest, cost and allied charges, in four (4) equated monthly installments, starting from 20.02.2026 and the subsequent installments shall be paid on or before 20th of every succeeding months.

b) The petitioner shall continue to pay the regular EMIs/installments along with the installments as directed above.

c) In the event of default of any one installment, the respondent Bank shall be entitled to proceed in accordance with law.

d) All coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance to enable the petitioner to repay the entire amount as directed above.

Sd/-

BASANT BALAJI JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top