EASWARAN S., J --------------------------------

R.P. No.78 of 2026 -------------------------------

Dated this the 30^th day of January, 2026 ORDER This review petition is preferred by the 1^st respondent in the appeal/plaintiff in the suit contending that the judgment rendered by this Court on 28.11.2025, without hearing the counsel is to be reviewed.

2. Heard Sri.R.Rajasekharan Pillai, the learned counsel for the review petitioner and Dr.V.N.Shankarjee, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants in the RSA.

3. Sri.R.Rajasekharan Pillai, learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner, in all fairness submitted that his inability to make alternative arrangements on the day had caused serious prejudice to the review petitioner, inasmuch as, none represented the respondents in the appeal, when the case was called for hearing. Therefore, he requests the Court to condone his non appearance and that an opportunity to advance arguments on the merits of the appeal be granted to him.

4. Per contra, Dr.V.N.Shankarjee, learned counsel appearing for the appellants contended that the non appearance of the counsel is not a ground under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure and that