IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
SUDHEEP KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
DEVAKI KUNJAMMA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellants' claim of title under first defendant. (Para 1) |
| 2. conflicting claims between parties regarding property. (Para 2) |
| 3. arguments presented by both counsel regarding property rights. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's analysis regarding property demarcation and admission of parties. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. decision made to set aside the decree and restore trial court's ruling. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT
The appeal is filed by third parties who were not arrayed as defendants in the proceedings. The appellants claim title under the first defendant in a suit for fixation of boundary and declaration of title. O.S.No.35 of 1985 was instituted on the files of the Munsiff Court, Kayamkulam which resulted in a dismissal of the suit on a categorical admission by the plaintiffs that they do not want any recovery of the property from the first defendant. Accordingly, the suit was dismissed. Aggrieved, they preferred an appeal before the Additional District Court-I, Mavelikara, wherein, an application seeking amendment of the plaint was filed which stood allowed. Though the first defendant raised a contention that the statement made by the plaintiff in the appli
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.