Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Section 4 Official Secrets Act Presumption and Prima Facie Evidence Bar Bail in Espionage Case: Punjab & Haryana HC
14 Mar 2026
Centre Revokes Wangchuk's NSA Detention Amid SC Challenge
14 Mar 2026
No Interference Allowed in Religious Prayers on Private Premises: Allahabad HC Cites Maranatha Precedent
14 Mar 2026
No Proof of Absolute Ownership by Mizo Chiefs Bars Fundamental Rights Claim Under Article 31: Supreme Court
14 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
CHELLAMMA, (DIED) (LEGAL HEIRS IMPLEADED) – Appellant
Versus
GOPALA PILLAI BALAKRISHNA PILLAI – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. core facts establishing the basis of the title dispute. (Para 2) |
| 2. legal observations on the necessity of proving adverse possession and its rejection. (Para 3 , 4 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. arguments concerning admissibility of claims on adverse possession. (Para 5 , 6) |
J U D G M E N T
2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the appeal are as follows:-
3. On 12.04.2012, this Court admit
Adverse possession cannot be claimed by a permissive occupant without admitting the true owner's title.
A person cannot claim adverse possession against the true owner if the occupation is permissive.
Adverse possession requires clear evidence of hostile intent and exclusive possession, which was not established in this case; mere possession or entries in revenue records do not suffice to claim ad....
(1) Adverse Possession – Plea of adverse possession is not always a legal plea – It is always based on facts which must be asserted and proved.
(2) Foundation for plea of adverse possession must b....
To prove adverse possession, the claimant must establish possession adverse to the true owner, long and continuous possession known to the true owner, the date of possession, and open and undisturbed....
Title claims and adverse possession are contradictory; plaintiffs must establish the timeline of possession with clear and consistent evidence to prevail in claims of adverse possession.
(1) Recovery of possession – Limitation – Suit based on title where plea of adverse possession had not been raised could not be barred by limitation on ground that it was filed after more than 12 yea....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article