Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 10146

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
GLOMIUM TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
DEEPAK A – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 6 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.7272 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri.Babu S. Nair
For the Respondents: Shri.Sunil Shanker, SMT.VIDYA GANGADHARAN, Shri.Thomas Glaison, Shri.Binoy Vasudevan, Shri.Mohan Jacob George

Contempt arising from failure to comply with an interim order requires impleading relevant requisitioning authorities for further consideration.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to a Contempt of Court case by GLOMIUM TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. against the operational status of accounts under WP

(C) NO.7272 OF 2025. The court found that requests from authorities caused non-compliance. The petitioner was advised to implead relevant authorities for further consideration. No contempt was established, leading to the closure of the case.

Table of Content
1. status of account operations and compliance with requisitions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioner advised on further steps regarding compliance. (Para 4)
3. closure of the case confirmed by the court. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 30^th day of January, 2026

1. The learned Standing Counsel for the 1^st respondent submitted that the account is operational. The same is recorded.

2. The learned Standing Counsel for the 2^nd respondent submitted that after the interim order, further requisition from Punjab Police Station is received and hence, the interim order could not be complied with.

3. The learned Standing Counsel for the 3^rd respondent submitted that, after the interim order, a requisition from a Police Station in Gujrat is received and hence, the interim order could not be complied with.

4. In such situation, it is for the petitioner to implead those requisitioning authorities and to bring up their petition for further consideration. There is no contempt in the matter.

5. Accordingly, the Contempt of Court Case is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 10146

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMM.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, JGLOMIUM TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. – AppellantVersusDEEPAK A – RespondentCON.CASE(C) NO. 6 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.7272 OF 2025

Contempt arising from failure to comply with an interim order requires impleading relevant requisitioning authorities for further consideration.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
GLOMIUM TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
DEEPAK A – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 6 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.7272 OF 2025