Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
THOMAS P.U. – Appellant
Versus
THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), WAYANAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant contests directions from previous judgment concerning retirement benefits. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents argue no error in the learned single judge's decision. (Para 3) |
| 3. court observes ongoing proceedings render no further adjudication necessary. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, J The present intra-court appeal filed under Section 5 of the Kerala High Court Act , 1958 assails the judgment dated 10.06.2022 passed in WP(C) No.2139/2020. The learned Single Judge while disposing of Writ Petition had passed the following directions:
(a) The competent Authority of the 2nd respondent will immediately consider if they can hold on to the amount of Gratuity paid by the LIC, against the anticipated liability of the petitioner; and this shall be done after hearing him, thus leading to an appropriate order thereafter, as expeditiously as is possible, but not later than three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. (b) As far as the Provident Fund and other retiral benefits of the petitioner are concerned, I am certainly of the view that the Bank will be justified in awaiting the final order in the enquiry under Section 68 of the 'KC
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
