Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
CHENTHAMARAKSHAN – Appellant
Versus
MEEMAKSHY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background facts of the dispute (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. identification of legal questions framed (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments from plaintiffs and defendants (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's analysis and observations on evidence (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 13) |
| 5. discussion on endorsement validity and rights (Para 12 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. conclusion on substantial questions and appeal outcome (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT
Legal heirs of defendants 1 and 2 in a suit for recovery of possession, aggrieved by the concurrent findings rendered against them are in appeal before this Court.
2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the appeal are as follows:-
The plaintiffs sued the original defendants 1 and 2, under Paattadharam, executed in favour of one Veemban in the year 1930. The plaintiffs claimed during the subsistence of the Paattadharam, one of the brother of Veemban, namely Kambi acquired the rights over the property by payment of Rs.50/-, which is endorsed in the Paattadharam. The defendants resisted the suit by contending that the devolution of title in favour of the plaintiffs is not correct and that the property was originally purchased by the grand father of the 1st defendant and Veemban. It was
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
