SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 10163

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
MATHEW THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SIDHARTHAN V.K.
For the Respondents: SHRI.ARUN AJAY SHANKAR, G.P

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a registered Contractor, who had undertaken contract work with the Government Departments. The challenge raised in this writ petition is against Ext.P1 revenue recovery notice and Ext.P4 order passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act. As far as Ext.P4 order is concerned, the same was passed as early as on 01.08.2024, and no challenge has been raised against the same by invoking the statutory remedies.

2. The reason stated by the petitioner is that the petitioner was not aware of the proceedings and that the said order was not served upon him.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner raised various contentions with regard to the sustainability of the demand made, on its merits. However, it is to be noted that, despite the fact that, Ext.P4 order was passed, as early as on 01.08.2024, the petitioner did not invoke any of the statutory remedies available, in time.

4. Even though it is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order was not served upon the petitioner, it is discernible from the pleadings itself that the said order as well as the show cause notices were downloaded by the petitioner from the web portal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top