Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
PALLIKALAKATH ABDUL MAJEED – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, TAX PAYER SERVICE CIRCLE NADAKKAVU – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. input tax credit eligibility under cgst based on timely return submissions. (Para 1) |
| 2. court finds merit in petitioner's argument for tax credit. (Para 2) |
| 3. final ruling mandates reconsideration of tax assessment. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is a registered tax payer under the provisions of the CGST and KGST Acts. Pertaining to the assessment year 2018-2019, the input tax credit claimed by the petitioner was rejected mainly on the ground that the petitioner failed to submit the returns for the months of February 2019 and March 2019 within the period stipulated under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act . The challenge against the said order of assessment, which was produced as Ext.P1 herein, is raised mainly on the ground that as per Section 16(5) of the CGST Act , the petitioner is entitled to get the input tax credit, as he had already submitted the returns within the cut off date contemplated under the said provision, namely 30.11.2021.
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, I find merit in the said submission.
3. On going through Ext.P1 order of assessment, it is discernible that the petitioner submitted the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
