IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
MV JOSEPH & SONS – Appellant
Versus
STATE TAX OFFICER, TAXPAYER SERVICES CIRCLE, ALAPPUZHA SOUTH – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is a registered tax payer under the provisions of the CGST and KGST Act. The grievance raised by the petitioner is against Ext.P2 order passed under Section 73 of the CGST Act , denying the input tax credit in respect of the months of July 2017 to March 2018. The challenge is raised by the petitioner against Ext.P2, by placing reliance upon Section 16(5) of the CGST Act , which provides that, if the tax payer is submitting the returns on or before 30.11.2021, he shall be entitled to get the input tax credit. In Ext.P2, the input tax credit was declined, mainly on the reason that the petitioner failed to submit the returns for the months referred to above, within the statutory period contemplated under Section
16(4).
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, I find some merits in the said submission.
3. It is discernible from Ext.P1 that, the petitioner submitted the returns during the relevant period on 16.08.2019, which is within the cut off date contemplated under Section 16(5). It is also to be noted that Section 16(5) starts with the wording “Notwithstanding anything contained in the Sub Section 4” which w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.