Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
ASHRAF ALI ABDUL KAREEM – Appellant
Versus
FEDERAL BANK LIMITED – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner requests bank to release liened funds. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court orders bank to release funds based on prior judgment. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 28th day of January, 2026
1. This is a case in which the Petitioner had earlier approached this Court by filing a Writ Petition when the Respondent No.1/Bank had received a requisition from the Respondent No.2 for an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- for marking lien in the account of the Petitioner mentioned in the Writ Petition. This Court had disposed of the Writ Petition by Ext.P3 judgment. In the Ext.P3 judgment, the Petitioner was allowed to operate the account, limiting the lien/debit freeze to the amount shown in the requisition. The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition stating that even after a period of eight months after the date of receipt of Ext.P3 judgment, the Respondent No.2 has not informed the Bank regarding the period up to which the lien is to be continued.
2. The learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent No.1/Bank confirmed that after receipt of Ext.P3 judgment by Respondent No.2, eight months have elapsed and no communication has been received from him.
3. In view of the aforesaid facts, this W
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
