SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 10170

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
T.P. Construction – Appellant
Versus
THE CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS WILD LIFE & CEO OF THE SPV FOR-ELEPHANT REHABILITATION CENTRE-KOTTOOR – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 48422 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.JINISH PAUL, SMT.SNEHA V.
For the Respondents: SRI.P.THOMAS GEEVERGHESE, SHRI.S.CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR, SHRI.T.P.SAJAN

The court affirmed that non-compliance with judicial orders regarding fund release constitutes illegality and ordered immediate compliance with settlements.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to release funds attached per a Commercial Court order. The facts outlined include the settlement between parties and the non-release of payments. The court found the withholding of payments illegal and issued directions for compliance with the settlement. The issues included the legality of the payment hold, underscoring that the respondents are obligated to release the agreed settlement amount. The court emphasized, '...I am of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of by directing the disbursement of the amounts...' The final order mandated the release of funds within two weeks of receiving the judgment.

Table of Content
1. court discusses the relief sought in the writ petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. respondents' position on the payment withholding is evaluated. (Para 4)
3. court orders compliance with payment release. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:

i. Issue a writ of mandamus or nay other appropriate Writ, Order or direction commanding respondents 1 & 2 to release the amount attached in C.S. No.5/2024, in terms of the Ext.P1 settlement and Ext.P3 order.

ii. Declare that the continued withholding of the payment by respondents 1 and 2 after Ext.P3 order is illegal, arbitrary, and in violation of the judicial order passed by the Commercial Court, Perumbavoor.

iii. Direct respondents 1 and 2 to disburse the amount to the petitioner without further delay, enabling the petitioner to honour the settlement with the 3rd respondent.

iv. Grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the interest of justice.

2. The facts that led to the filing of this writ petition are as follows:

The petitioner is the 1st defendant in C.S. No.5/2024 on the files of the Commercial Court, Perumbavoor, which suit was filed by the 3rd respondent for recovery of money from the petitioner. In the said suit, garnishee order was passed by the Commercial Court, in respect of the amounts payable to the petitioner by respondents 1 and 2. Subsequently, a dispute between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent was settled, and Ext.P1 is the mediation settlement agreement entered into between the parties. Ext.P2 is the application submitted by the petitioner, directing the garnishee respondents to release an amount of Rs.50 Lakhs, being the settlement amount, to the plaintiffs therein, i.e., the 3rd respondent herein, and the remaining amount to be released to the petitioner.

3. The said application was allowed as per Ext.P3 order by the Commercial Court, Perumbavoor. Since the amounts were not released by the 1st and 2nd respondents, this writ petition is seeking the above reliefs.

4. In response to the averments contained in the writ petition, a statement was submitted by the 1st respondent. In the said statement, it is submitted that, as the said respondent was not a party to the Ext.P1 settlement, they are not in a position to transfer the amount of Rs.50 lakhs to the 3rd respondent herein, in terms of Exts.P1 and P3 orders. However, the 1st respondent expressed no objection in the petitioner transferring the amount agreed between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent, to the 3rd respondent’s account in terms of Ext.P1.

5. Now in the light of the aforesaid averments and also Ext.P3 order, I am of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of by directing the disbursement of the amounts, in tune with the settlement arrived at between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the 1st and 2nd respondents shall ensure the release of an amount of Rs.50 Lakhs to the account of the 3rd respondent, in compliance with Ext.P3 order passed by the Commercial Court, Perumbavoor, in I.A. No. 11/2025 in C.S. No. 5/2024, and the remaining amount shall be released to the petitioner. The same shall be done within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top