Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MR. MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
LEKSHMI C.A – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to order by applicants seeking reporting of vacancies. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. responses and data presented by deputy director regarding vacancies. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. interim orders facilitating the reporting of vacancies. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. arguments presented by the petitioners regarding the denial to report vacancies. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. high court's supervisory role under article 227 discussed. (Para 15 , 16 , 20) |
| 6. conclusion on the legality of the tribunal's order and dismissal of original petitions. (Para 19 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT
[OP(KAT) Nos.482/2025, 496/2025 & 499/2025]
Muralee Krishna S., J.
The 2nd applicant in O.A.No.1947 of 2021, the 1st and 3rd applicant in O.A.No.886 of 2021 and the 3rd applicant in O.A.No.2181 of 2021 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram, (‘the Tribunal’ for short) filed these original petitions, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the common order dated 03.04.2025 passed by the Tribunal in those original applications.
2. The applicants in the original applications are included in the ranked list dated 28.12.2018 for the post of UPSA
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
