IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MR. MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
LEKSHMI C.A – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to order by applicants seeking reporting of vacancies. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. responses and data presented by deputy director regarding vacancies. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. interim orders facilitating the reporting of vacancies. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. arguments presented by the petitioners regarding the denial to report vacancies. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. high court's supervisory role under article 227 discussed. (Para 15 , 16 , 20) |
| 6. conclusion on the legality of the tribunal's order and dismissal of original petitions. (Para 19 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna S., J.
2. The applicants in the original applications are included in the ranked list dated 28.12.2018 for the post of UPSA (Malayalam Medium) in Alappuzha District, the selection of which was conducted pursuant to the notification dated 15.10.2014 of the Kerala Public Service Commission (‘the KPSC’ for short). As per G.O.(Rt)No.3287/2021/GEdn dated 06.07.2021, the Government has ordered that the staff fixation made in Government and Aided Schools for the year 2019-20 will continue for the academic years 2020-21 and 2021-22 in the background of Covid 19 Pandemic. According to the applicants, despite the existence of a large


Muhammed Siyad P.A v. Sreejith Appu
Shalini Shyam Shetty v. Rajendra Shankar Patil
Jai Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
K.V.S. Ram v. Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation
Sobhana Nair K.N. v. Shaji S.G. Nair
Kerala Aided L.P. and U.P. School, Kollam v. State of Kerala
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.