SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 10199

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MR. MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
LEKSHMI C.A – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
OP(KAT) NO. 482 OF 2025|OP(KAT) NO. 496 OF 2025|OP(KAT) NO. 499 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.REKHA VASUDEVAN, SMT.ELIZABETH V.JOSEPH, SMT.ASWATHY ANILKUMAR, SMT.SOYA D.C, SHRI.MAHESH C.R., SMT.ANN MARY ANSEL
For the Respondents: SRI. A.J. VARGHESE, SR. GP; SRI. P. C. SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC

The court reinforced that candidates cannot compel filling vacancies from expired ranked lists, affirming appointing authorities' discretion over vacancy reporting under government policy.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 227 - Supervisory jurisdiction - Challenging the common order of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal regarding the reporting of vacancies in the Education Department - The Tribunal found that there are no substantive rights to claim vacancies from an expired ranked list - Response from the Deputy Director of Education and Kerala Public Service Commission confirmed that vacancies arose post-expiry - Court affirmed Tribunal's dismissal of original applications due to lack of merit. (Paras 1-24)

Facts of the case:
The applicants included in the ranked list for the post of UPSA (Malayalam Medium) sought a direction to report existing vacancies to the Kerala Public Service Commission (KPSC) before the expiry of their ranked list on 27.12.2021, claiming significant post vacancies remained unreported. They produced information gathered under the Right to Information Act to assert their claims.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal dismissed the original applications, noting no evidence that vacancies existed when the ranked list was operational and maintained that the Government’s policy precluded filling vacancies beyond the rank list's expiry.

Issues: The primary issues included the right of the applicants to claim unreported vacancies despite the expiry of the ranked list and the validity of the respondents' reporting process.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that candidates cannot demand the filling of vacancies from an expired ranked list and that the appointing authority's decision not to report vacancies was within its jurisdiction unless shown to be arbitrary. The court emphasized the limits of its supervisory powers under Article 227.

Result: Original petitions dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to order by applicants seeking reporting of vacancies. (Para 1 , 2)
2. responses and data presented by deputy director regarding vacancies. (Para 3 , 4)
3. interim orders facilitating the reporting of vacancies. (Para 5 , 6)
4. arguments presented by the petitioners regarding the denial to report vacancies. (Para 10 , 11)
5. high court's supervisory role under article 227 discussed. (Para 15 , 16 , 20)
6. conclusion on the legality of the tribunal's order and dismissal of original petitions. (Para 19 , 22 , 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT

[OP(KAT) Nos.482/2025, 496/2025 & 499/2025]

Muralee Krishna S., J.

The 2nd applicant in O.A.No.1947 of 2021, the 1st and 3rd applicant in O.A.No.886 of 2021 and the 3rd applicant in O.A.No.2181 of 2021 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram, (‘the Tribunal’ for short) filed these original petitions, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the common order dated 03.04.2025 passed by the Tribunal in those original applications.

2. The applicants in the original applications are included in the ranked list dated 28.12.2018 for the post of UPSA (Malayalam Medium) in Alappuzha District, the selection of which was conducted pursuant to the notification dated 15.10.2014 of the Kerala Public Service Commission (‘the KPSC’ for short). As per G.O.(Rt)No.3287/2021/GEdn dated 06.07.2021, the Government has ordered that the staff fixation made in Government and Aided Schools for the year 2019-20 will continue for the academic years 2020-21 and 2021-22 in the background of Covid 19 Pandemic. According to the applicants, despite the existence of a large number of vacancies of UPSA (Malayalam Medium), the same are not being reported to the KPSC. The applicants plead that the amendment made to the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 , as per GO(P)No.1/2021/GEdn dated 05.01.2021, is under challenge in various original applications before the Tribunal, wherein there is an interim order of status quo. Therefore, the vacancies of the Head Masters in various schools, including retirement vacancies, are being left vacant. In such circumstances, the applicants who are included in the ranked list of Alappuzha District are seriously prejudiced due to the non-reporting of the vacancies to the KPSC. The ranked list published by the KPSC expired on 27.12.2021. Before the expiry of the ranked list, the applicants filed the respective original applications under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , seeking a direction against the Deputy Director of Education, Alappuzha, to report all existing vacancies of UPSA (Malayalam Medium) and also consequential vacancies of Head Master promotion and staff fixation, to the District Officer of the KPSC, Alappuzha, before the expiry of the ranked list. The applicants have also sought for a direction against the District Officer of the KPSC, Alappuzha, to issue advice memos against the vacancies reported, including the applicants from the ranked list and to direct the Deputy Director of Education, Alappuzha, to issue orders of appointment against the advised vacancies, including the applicants from the ranked list.

3. On behalf of the Deputy Director of Education, Alappuzha, reply statements and additional reply statements are filed in the original applications raising almost the same contentions. For convenience, we are referring to the reply statement dated 03.09.2021 and the additional reply statement dated 20.06.2024 filed on behalf of the Deputy Director of Education in O.A.No.886 of 2021. Paragraphs 6 to 11 of the reply statement dated 03.09.2021 filed on behalf of the Deputy Director of Education, Alappuzha read thus:

“6. It is humbly submitted that a total No: of 571 posts were sanctioned in the cadre of U.P. School Teachers (Malayalam Medium) during 2019-20 in Alappuzha revenue District. Cadre strength details of UP School Teachers durin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top