SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 10244

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
BABU S/O.GEORGE – Respondent
OP (MAC) NO. 89 OF 2019 | OPMV NO.360 OF 2012



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.MATHEWS JACOB (SR.), SHRI.P.JACOB MATHEW
For the Respondents: SHRI.PRAMOD J.DEV, SHRI.MANOJ D.R.

The Amendment of claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act does not prejudice the insurance company and should be expedited by the Tribunal.

Headnote:The petitioner insurance company, by filing OP (MAC) NO. 89 OF 2019, challenges the order passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal allowing an amendment to convert the claim petition pursuant to the Motor Vehicles Act. The Tribunal affirmed the claim under Section 163A, which was not found illegal by the Court. The Court mandates the Tribunal to expedite the claim petition resolution within two months while leaving all merits contested.

Table of Content
1. challenge to amendment of claim petition under motor vehicles act. (Para 1)
2. court affirms tribunal's decision and expedites claim resolution. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner insurance company challenges Ext.P1 order passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Neyyattinakara, allowing I.A No.1129 of 2019 in O.P.(M.V) No.360 of 2012, through which an amendment application filed by the claimant to convert the claim petition from Section 166 to Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act is allowed. The Tribunal found that the claim can be made under 163 A and that the claimant could choose the claim.

2. On going through the order impugned and after hearing both sides, I do not find any illegality in the order passed by the Tribunal, as the same does not affect the insurance company in any manner or prejudice them. Under such circumstances, the original petition fails and is accordingly dismissed.

Further proceedings in the claim petition were stayed by this Court on 15.10.2019, and taking note of the fact that the claim petition is of 2012, there will be a direction to the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Neyyattinakara, to dispose of O.P.(M.V) No.360 of 2012 at the earliest, at any rate within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. All the contentions of the parties on the merits are left open.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top