Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 10350
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
SUNNY PALATTY – Appellant
Versus
SPECIAL SALE OFFICER, PARAKKADAVU SCB GROUP – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 36052 OF 2025
Important Points
The court allows the withdrawal of a writ petition with liberty to file a new one.
Subject
Civil - Writ Petition
Headnote
This judgment pertains to WP
(C) NO. 36052 OF 2025 where the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty to file a fresh. The court accepted the request, dismissing the case as withdrawn. The court highlights that withdrawal does not preclude the filing of a new petition. The final ruling was that the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner to file afresh.
(C) NO. 36052 OF 2025 where the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty to file a fresh. The court accepted the request, dismissing the case as withdrawn. The court highlights that withdrawal does not preclude the filing of a new petition. The final ruling was that the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner to file afresh.
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.AJAI JOHN, SHRI.V.M.SAJAN
For the Respondents: SMT. SILPA N.P (GP)
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.AJAI JOHN, SHRI.V.M.SAJAN
For the Respondents: SMT. SILPA N.P (GP)
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed seeking withdrawal of the writ petition, with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty reserved to file a fresh writ petition.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P., JUDGE
