SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 10350

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
SUNNY PALATTY – Appellant
Versus
SPECIAL SALE OFFICER, PARAKKADAVU SCB GROUP – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 36052 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.AJAI JOHN, SHRI.V.M.SAJAN
For the Respondents: SMT. SILPA N.P (GP)

The court allows the withdrawal of a writ petition with liberty to file a new one.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to WP

(C) NO. 36052 OF 2025 where the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty to file a fresh. The court accepted the request, dismissing the case as withdrawn. The court highlights that withdrawal does not preclude the filing of a new petition. The final ruling was that the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner to file afresh.

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed seeking withdrawal of the writ petition, with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.

In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty reserved to file a fresh writ petition.

Sd/-

GOPINATH P., JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top